Are You Going Exponential
areyougoingexponential.vercel.app- Category
- Developer Tools
- Rank
- No. 4272Tools index
Previous survey · No. 4049 ·
- Pricing
- Free
- Type
- APP
- Use case
- Data Processing
- Interfaces
- Web
- Date
About
Charts a GitHub username’s contribution history with sharing controls and a public recent-generations list. It is a playful activity view; the chart does not establish exponential growth, work quality or complete productivity.
At a glance
Are You Going Exponential charts a GitHub username’s contribution history as a shareable visual. It is worth a quick look as a playful activity snapshot. The shape of that line does not measure the quality of someone’s work, prove exponential growth or explain why their visible activity changed.
Good fit
Developers curious about their public contribution pattern and people who enjoy a small social chart. The inspected example showed a long timeline and a contributions total, with link/image sharing controls. The visual makes a sudden change easy to notice; interpreting that change requires context the chart does not supply.
Consider something else when
You are assessing hiring suitability, individual productivity or a person’s complete work history. GitHub counts particular qualifying activities, and private-contribution visibility depends on profile settings. A sparse chart is not proof that somebody is inactive, and a dense one is not proof of valuable output.
Start here
Open an existing example, inspect its time axis and compare it with the person’s GitHub contribution history. To generate your own, the homepage asks for a valid GitHub username and Go. We inspected an existing example and the homepage; no new username lookup, social post or image export was submitted.
Cost and requirements
The public example and home page opened without payment or sign-in. A recent-generations list is visible, so do not assume a submitted username is a private lookup. No GitHub authorization or private repository access was requested during this inspection.
Limits to know
The share link included a growth percentage that was not independently recalculated. Source research establishes GitHub’s contribution-counting limits, not how this app retrieves, caches or aggregates every year. Use it for curiosity rather than a decision about another person’s ability.
Still unclear
- How does the app handle missing/private contribution data, caching and the growth percentage used in share text?
Sources checked 2026-10-30. Source-based assessment.
What it can do
Offer a contribution-history chart
GitHub username → Visible activity trend with data-completeness limits
Offer link/image/social sharing controls
Displayed chart → Shareable activity view; export not tested
Why it made the leaderboard
Makes visible contribution patterns easier to notice. Counting rules, private visibility and missing data limit what the line says about a person; the displayed growth percentage was not independently recalculated.
Tags
Media
Comments (0)
No comments yet
Editorially curated, with community endorsements as a secondary signal. Corrections welcome.