Vibeleaderboard
Index / tool
Visit github.com
Category
Cybersecurity
Rank

Previous survey · No. 502 ·

Pricing
Open Source
Type
TOOL
Builder
meta-llama
Date

About

Meta's set of trust-and-safety tools for assessing and improving LLM security — code-scanning, jailbreak benchmarks, and input/output classifiers.

What it does

Purple Llama combines model evaluation with runtime defenses. Teams can probe models against cybersecurity scenarios, moderate conversations and images, identify hostile prompts, and inspect generated code before execution. Its approach joins offensive testing with defensive filtering, so findings can inform both model assessment and application controls.

Why it's ranked here

The project covers an unusually broad security workflow, from standards-based evaluation to concrete runtime decisions. Code inspection returns issues, severity, and block-or-warn guidance rather than a bare verdict. The package is less cohesive than that scope suggests: onboarding points to separate repositories, and licensing differs between benchmarks, models, and safeguards.

What's good

The code inspector supports eight common languages and combines regular-expression rules with Semgrep analysis. It can scan every supported language concurrently when callers do not specify one. Findings carry CWE identifiers, severity, location, rule details, and suggested treatment. The benchmark suite spans prompt injection, code-interpreter abuse, spear phishing, vulnerability exploitation, and autonomous offensive operations.

Tradeoffs

Code inspection catches every analysis exception, logs it, and returns the same non-insecure, ignore result used when nothing is found. Callers therefore need separate failure monitoring to avoid treating scanner outages as clean code. Semgrep must be available through its package or the system path, and setup creates a nearby symbolic link. Model safeguards also use Llama Community licenses rather than MIT.

How to use it well

Use it when an LLM team needs repeatable adversarial evaluation before release and runtime gates around prompts, responses, or generated code. Record benchmark results, then connect warning and blocking decisions to application policy and operational monitoring. It does not supply a complete deployment layer: the project directs adopters to separate Llama reference-system and recipe repositories for integration guidance.

Technical notes+

CodeShield/codeshield.py exposes the async CodeShield.scan_code library interface, runs supported-language analyses through asyncio.gather, and maps any Severity.ERROR finding to Treatment.BLOCK; its broad exception handler returns the initialized clean-looking result. CodeShield/insecure_code_detector/oss.py locates semgrep-core, creates an osemgrep symlink, disables metrics, emits JSON, and caps workers at 16. CodeShield/insecure_code_detector/languages.py declares the language and extension maps but limits active scanning to C, C++, C#, Java, JavaScript, PHP, Python, and Rust. SensitiveDocClassification/setup.py packages classifyit for Python 3.8 or newer and installs the classifyit console command, while SensitiveDocClassification/scanner.py loads YAML configuration and scans Google Drive through Llama Stack.

Observed

Licensing
Cybersecurity evaluations and Code Shield use MIT; model safeguards use the corresponding Llama Community licenses.
Interfaces
Code Shield provides an asynchronous Python library interface; ClassifyIt provides a console command.
Packaging
ClassifyIt uses setuptools, requires Python 3.8 or newer, and declares Llama Stack, YAML, Tika, Peewee, and Google API dependencies.
Code analysis
Code Shield uses regular-expression and Semgrep analyzers and reports CWE-linked issues with severity and optional source locations.
Supported scan languages
Active Code Shield scanning covers C, C++, C#, Java, JavaScript, PHP, Python, and Rust.
Benchmark structure
The documentation sidebar lists ten cybersecurity benchmark areas, including prompt injection, spear phishing, autopatching, and threat-intelligence reasoning.

Read from README.md, CodeShield/example.py, CodeShield/__init__.py, CodeShield/codeshield.py, CybersecurityBenchmarks/__init__.py, SensitiveDocClassification/setup.py, SensitiveDocClassification/scanner.py, CodeShield/insecure_code_detector/oss.py, SensitiveDocClassification/cli/__init__.py, CodeShield/insecure_code_detector/issues.py, CybersecurityBenchmarks/website/sidebars.js, CybersecurityBenchmarks/datasets/__init__.py, CodeShield/insecure_code_detector/usecases.py, CodeShield/insecure_code_detector/analyzers.py, CodeShield/insecure_code_detector/languages.py.

What it can do

  • Scan code for security vulnerabilities

    Source code filesSecurity vulnerability report

  • Benchmark LLM resistance to jailbreak attempts

    Large language model and jailbreak promptsJailbreak vulnerability assessment

  • Classify input prompts for safety risks

    Text promptsSafety risk classification scores

  • Classify LLM output responses for harmful content

    LLM generated text responsesHarmful content detection results

  • Assess overall LLM security posture

    Large language model systemComprehensive security assessment report

  • Evaluate trust and safety measures

    LLM deployment configurationTrust and safety compliance metrics

Tags

llmsecuritymetared-teamtrust-safety

Tech Stack

CC++CSSDockerfileJavaScriptJupyter NotebookMDXPHPPythonShell

Comments (0)

No comments yet

Editorially curated, with community endorsements as a secondary signal. Corrections welcome.