Vibeleaderboard
← All Intel
Intel / article

PAWS: Policy-driven Agentic World Simulation

Source
Tiviatis Sim, Jia Hui Woon, Xinming Gao, Chen Gao, Fengbin Zhu, Zheng Huanhuan, Chua Tat Seng, Kenji Kawaguchi
Author
Tiviatis Sim, Jia Hui Woon, Xinming Gao, Chen Gao, Fengbin Zhu, Zheng Huanhuan, Chua Tat Seng, Kenji Kawaguchi
Date
Key takeaways · AI-distilled
  • PAWS covers 36 verified U.S. financial and economic policy episodes, 12,727 policy-linked news records and 65,291 stakeholder actions, each linked to the news that supports it.
  • Each action carries a multi-layer event frame (interaction mode, financial-action family and subtype, semantic attributes), with entities resolved to normalized organizations and actions aligned to daily market returns for replay.
  • Case studies of the 2008 short-selling ban and 2001 decimalization recovered documented policy timelines and associated market patterns in both dense and sparse news settings.
  • A replay study found that high accuracy can mask failure to detect rare stakeholder actions, pointing to action timing and as the central challenges.
Terms in this piece · Glossary
  • grounding — Tying a model's answers to checkable sources — retrieved documents, live data, tool results — instead of letting it answer from memory alone.
  • multi-agent — Using several AI agents on one problem — splitting work in parallel, checking each other, or filling different roles like planner and reviewer.
  • AI agent — An AI system that doesn't just answer once but works toward a goal in a loop — taking actions, reading the results, and deciding what to do next.
  • calibration — How well a model's confidence matches reality — a calibrated model saying "90% sure" is right about 90% of the time.
Why it matters

Gives builders of agentic financial or policy simulations a large, source- dataset with 89.4% human-AI annotation agreement to ground behavior in verified historical stakeholder responses.

Recommended reads
Comments

Checking sign-in…

Loading comments…