CriticGen: Generation-Aware Evaluation as Actionable Feedback
- Source
- arxiv.org
- Author
- Huifang Du, Zecheng Zuo, Sen Wang, Chenghao Fan, Haofen Wang, Yehui Yang
- Date
Context
CriticGen connects judging an AI answer with revising it. It first creates criteria tailored to the particular response, then uses those criteria to produce a score, explain a flaw, specify a correction and generate a revised answer. That gives the revision process something more concrete to follow than a general quality rating. Research abstract.
The authors report improved answers in 73.17% of evaluated cases and no degradation in 93.28%. These are results from their , not a universal success rate. The authors take them as support for their thesis that useful feedback should be specific to the answer and actionable.
- eval — A repeatable test for AI quality — a set of tasks plus scoring — used the way software teams use test suites, because model output is too variable to judge by eyeballing.
- LLM — A large language model — the neural network behind tools like Claude and ChatGPT, trained on huge amounts of text to predict what comes next.
- AI agent — An AI system that doesn't just answer once but works toward a goal in a loop — taking actions, reading the results, and deciding what to do next.
“Current evaluation methods for large language models are coarse-grained and decoupled from generation, producing generic explanations that fail to provide actionable feedback for model improvement.”
“CriticGen induces higher-quality rubrics, improving relevance/coverage from 3.33/4.03 to 3.97/4.24.”
“CriticGen also achieves the best score correlations, with 0.9556 Pearson and 0.9560 Spearman, and raises the F1 of criterion-grounded reasons and executable suggestions from 0.6369/0.5994 to 0.7554/0.7900.”
“Crucially, its feedback translates into reliable answer improvement, improving 73.17% of answers with a 93.28% non-degradation rate.”
articleExecuCritic: Calibrated Critic Shaping for Code Generation with Verifiable RewardsJunjie Cao, Yingjie He
articleTalking to Itself While Coding: What Makes Comments Help Code Generation?Dangfeng Pan, Zhensu Sun, Cenyuan Zhang, David Lo, Xiaoning Du
articleInducing Reward-Free Judging Rubrics that Reduce Over-Crediting in Agent EvaluationDarragh Quinn, David Dylan, Roisin Healy, Fionn Carroll, Maeve Donnelly, Cormac Sheehan
Checking sign-in…
Loading comments…