Vibeleaderboard
← All Intel
Intel / article

Unconstrained CTI-REALM with Open-Weights

Source
arxiv.org
Author
Sahil Garg, Ruhi Gottumukkala, Vishal Agarwal, Shubham Vishwakarma
Date
Why it matters

The 's turn cap partly measures who finishes in time. With the cap relaxed, open-weight models matched or beat closed ones at under a tenth of the cost, which changes model choice for security agents.

Key takeaways · AI-distilled
  • On CTI-REALM, a run that hits the message limit scores zero on every checkpoint, including ones already passed. At the published limit the leading and closed models cannot be distinguished.
  • The authors add stage-level metrics that execute each 's detection queries against the telemetry store. Different models lead different stages, so they suggest routing each workflow stage to its best model.
  • Among leading models, price was a poor guide: models with similar rewards differed in cost by more than an order of magnitude, and the share of output spent on thinking did not track reward. The study covers 19 open-weight and 7 closed models.
Terms in this piece · Glossary
  • open weights — A model whose trained parameters are published for anyone to download and run — unlike API-only models you can access but never possess.
  • benchmark — A standard public test set for comparing AI models — the shared scoreboards behind every "model X beats model Y" claim.
  • AI agent — An AI system that doesn't just answer once but works toward a goal in a loop — taking actions, reading the results, and deciding what to do next.
Recommended reads
Comments

Checking sign-in…

Loading comments…