Cross-Provider Review as a Runtime Contract for Coding Agents: A Controlled Pilot and Fault-Injection Study
Source
arxiv.org
Author
Bowen Xu, Boyu Chen
Date
Why it matters
A second agent from another provider caught material issues in 8 of 20 turns, but reviewers can silently pass on truncated input or attempt writes despite read-only settings. Design explicit failure states and sandboxAn isolated environment where AI-generated code or agent actions run without being able to touch anything real.Full definition → checks.
Key takeaways · AI-distilled
The authors' advisory review contract has seven parts: distinct resource pools, bounded execution, restricted reviewer capabilities, complete input delivery, usable semantic output, explicit failure states and durable per-attempt evidence.
The 8-of-20 material-finding rate comes from a small, AI agentAn AI system that doesn't just answer once but works toward a goal in a loop — taking actions, reading the results, and deciding what to do next.Full definition →-authored pilot; its 95% exact interval runs from 19.1% to 63.9%, so the true rate is loosely bounded.
In real CLI probes, Claude's reviewer had no writing tools, while Codex attempted writes in all five read-only trials; every write tool call failed and no disposable repository changed.
A preregistered shadow study hit a third defect after 25 observations: a reviewer exiting nonzero with a well-formed verdict was counted as complete. Exit status was not logged per attempt, so the valid cohort restarted at zero.
The authors stress the tests cover specified paths and versions, not field reliability, and the paper reports no gate result yet.
Terms in this piece · Glossary
AI agent — An AI system that doesn't just answer once but works toward a goal in a loop — taking actions, reading the results, and deciding what to do next.
sandbox — An isolated environment where AI-generated code or agent actions run without being able to touch anything real.