Vibeleaderboard
← All Intel
Intel / article

DeepInstructor: An Agentic AI Instructor for Experience-Driven Idea Evaluation

Source
Rongcan Pei, Fang Guo, Qinglin Qi, Qi Zhu, Yun Luo, Jianhao Yan, Minjun Zhu, Qiujie Xie, Dehong Zheng, Yue Zhang
Author
Rongcan Pei, Fang Guo, Qinglin Qi, Qi Zhu, Yun Luo, Jianhao Yan, Minjun Zhu, Qiujie Xie, Dehong Zheng, Yue Zhang
Date
Key takeaways · AI-distilled
  • The authors argue LLMs now generate research ideas faster than they can be judged, and that existing evaluators rely on parametric model knowledge or unstructured retrieval rather than experience- reasoning.
  • They release DeepInstruct, a dataset of controlled pairwise idea comparisons along three dimensions: novelty, significance and feasibility.
  • DeepInstructor improved Hit@1 and Hit@2 with human judgments by 24.4% and 29.7% over existing baselines, with the retrieved evidence making each evaluation traceable.
Terms in this piece · Glossary
  • AI agentAn AI system that doesn't just answer once but works toward a goal in a loop — taking actions, reading the results, and deciding what to do next.
  • LLMA large language model — the neural network behind tools like Claude and ChatGPT, trained on huge amounts of text to predict what comes next.
  • groundingTying a model's answers to checkable sources — retrieved documents, live data, tool results — instead of letting it answer from memory alone.
  • alignmentThe work of making AI systems actually pursue what their builders and users intend, rather than something subtly or dangerously different.
Why it matters

Demonstrates a concrete pattern for grounding an 's subjective judgments in structured retrieved experience rather than raw model opinion, improving alignment with human judgments by double digits.

Recommended reads
Comments

Checking sign-in…

Loading comments…