← All IntelIntel / article 
Measure, Don't Optimize: Forecasting Recovery in LLM Unlearning
- Source
- arxiv.org
- Author
- Zirui Song, Huaxing Liu, Xiang Wang, Shuai Li, Xinye Li, Lang Gao, Jinghui Zhang, Zheng Lu, Fengxian Ji, Xiaojun Chang, Xiuying Chen
- Date

Why it matters
If you rely on unlearning for safety or compliance, clean outputs aren't enough — residual internal accessibility predicts how quickly removed knowledge comes back under further .
Terms in this piece · Glossary
- fine-tuning — Taking a trained model and training it a bit more on your own examples so it gets better at one specific job.
Read the source arxiv.org
Recommended reads
articleMemorization Diagnostics for Code LLMs Should be Scale-AwarePrateek Kumar Rajput, Abdoul Aziz Bonkoungou, Alberick Euraste Djir\'e, Xunzhu Tang, Yewei Song, Iyiola Emmanuel Olatunji, El Hacen Diallo, Jacques Klein, Tegawend\'e F. Bissyand\'e
articleA Removal Based Approach to Improve LLM Faithfulness at Test-TimeQinglan Luo, S M A Nahian, John Guttag, S. Mazdak Abulnaga, Katie Matton
articleFrom Detection to Refusal: Safer LLMs via Circuit-Guided Weight ScalingKuan-Lin Chu, Chung-En Sun, Tsui-Wei Weng
Comments
Checking sign-in…
Loading comments…