Vibeleaderboard
← All Intel
Intel / article

Building Effective Agents

Source
anthropic.com
Author
Anthropic research
Date
Why it matters

Defines the workflow versus distinction and argues for the simplest solution first, since agentic systems trade latency and cost for performance. Useful for deciding when an agent is warranted before adopting a framework.

Key takeaways · AI-distilled
  • Anthropic defines workflows as LLMs and tools orchestrated through predefined code paths, and agents as systems where the directs its own process and ; workflows suit well-defined tasks, agents suit flexible decisions at scale.
  • For many applications, Anthropic says optimizing a single LLM call with retrieval and in- examples is enough, and building no agentic system at all may be the right choice.
  • Frameworks simplify setup but add abstraction that hides prompts and responses; Anthropic advises starting with direct LLM API calls, and says wrong assumptions about framework internals are a common source of customer error.
  • The basic building block is an augmented LLM with retrieval, tools and memory; Anthropic recommends tailoring these to the use case and giving the model a simple, well-documented interface to them.
Terms in this piece · Glossary
  • AI agent — An AI system that doesn't just answer once but works toward a goal in a loop — taking actions, reading the results, and deciding what to do next.
  • LLM — A large language model — the neural network behind tools like Claude and ChatGPT, trained on huge amounts of text to predict what comes next.
  • tool use — A model's ability to call external functions — run code, search the web, edit files — instead of only generating text.
  • context window — The maximum amount of text a model can consider at once — its working memory for the current conversation or task.
Read the source www.anthropic.com
More from Anthropic research
Recommended reads
Comments

Checking sign-in…

Loading comments…