CUADebug
- Source
- arxiv.org
- Author
- Weijia Zhang, Kunlun Zhu, Zeyi Liu, Yinting Chen, Tianyi Ma, Jiateng Liu, Jiaxun Zhang, Bingxuan Li, Xiangru Tang, Heng Ji, Jiaxuan You
- Date

Context
A computer-using 's final failure may originate several actions earlier. CUADebug searches for that earlier mistake by inspecting selected steps, paired screenshots and action records. It returns a diagnosis identifying the causal step, supporting evidence and a correction to guide another attempt. Framework description.
In the revised study, a single retry with this approach recovered 29.86% of failed tasks, compared with 13.89% in the comparison condition. Human annotations fixed restart points in controlled retry comparisons, although the debugger produced its diagnoses without intervention on each trajectory. The result supports diagnosis-guided recovery under that setup. Revised results.
- Human annotation of 204 failed OSWorld trajectories puts task reasoning and control as the largest computer-use-agent failure family (110/204), ahead of perception (36) and /interaction (25).
- CUADebugger actively inspects suspicious steps with paired before/after screenshots instead of prompting once over the whole trajectory, emitting a structured root-cause diagnosis with corrective strategy.
- Root-cause-informed re-execution nearly doubles task completion vs history-only continuation (29.9% vs 13.9% single-shot; 12.2% to 25.9% continual, near the 29.2% human-oracle ceiling).
- The takeaway for agent builders: diagnosis is an actionable repair signal, not just a post-hoc explanation - and it transfers across debugger backbones.
- AI agent — An AI system that doesn't just answer once but works toward a goal in a loop — taking actions, reading the results, and deciding what to do next.
- benchmark — A standard public test set for comparing AI models — the shared scoreboards behind every "model X beats model Y" claim.
- grounding — Tying a model's answers to checkable sources — retrieved documents, live data, tool results — instead of letting it answer from memory alone.
“CUA failures arise from coupled visual perception, spatial grounding, low-level interaction, task reasoning, and environment dynamics, making debugging a distinctive multimodal causal localization problem.”
“These results show that CUA root-cause diagnosis can provide actionable repair signals rather than merely post-hoc explanations.”
articleUnderstanding Tool-Mediated Interaction Failures in Agentic GUI Software: An Empirical StudyYuchen Shao (East China Normal University, Shanghai Innovation Institute), Wenjing Liu (East China Normal University), Yuheng Huang (University of Tokyo), Mengqian Xu (East China Normal University Shanghai Innovation Institute), Ziqun Bao (East China Normal University), Long Yang (East China Normal University Shanghai Innovation Institute), Lei Ma (University of Tokyo University of Alberta), Ting Su (East China Normal University), Chengcheng Wan (East China Normal University Shanghai Innovation Institute)
articleUnderstanding Bugs in Modern Agentic Frameworks: A Study of Symptoms, Root Causes, and Triggering ConditionsXiaowen Zhang, Hannuo Zhang, Shin Hwei Tan
articleSearchAuditor: Auditing and Attributing Failures in Long-Horizon Search AgentsZhixiang Liang, Yifei Liu, Yidan Huang, Haozhe Zhao, Beichen Huang, Jiaqi Wang, Nan Duan, Qiong Cao
Checking sign-in…
Loading comments…