Finishing the Task Is Not Enough: Evaluating Agent Resilience and Considerate Participation under Accumulating Challenge
- Source
- arxiv.org
- Author
- Yuanchen Bai, Zijian Ding, Angelique Taylor
- Date

Context
The authors of a study of 120 simulated healthcare trajectories, using two generative AI models and twelve tasks, report that as disruptions accumulate, agents shift from recovering on their own toward greater dependence on people. Their title argues that finishing the task is not enough to judge an that must keep working through repeated problems.
The authors propose evaluating both recovery from blocked work and the effects of that recovery on other participants. This includes whether an agent preserves progress, communicates its limits, respects role boundaries, and coordinates appropriately. From the simulations they derive deployment dilemmas, including persistence and escalation, which pose a question teams must specify for themselves: when should an agent keep trying, change the task, or involve another person?
- AI agent — An AI system that doesn't just answer once but works toward a goal in a loop — taking actions, reading the results, and deciding what to do next.
videoStanford CS329A Self-Improving AI Agents | Part 8 | Agentic Evaluations and Long Horizon TasksStanford Online
articleLong-Horizon-Terminal-Bench 2.0: Automating Diverse Task Construction and Measuring Sustained Agent ProgressZongxia Li, Zhongzhi Li, Yucheng Shi, Ruhan Wang, Junyao Yang, Chengsong Huang, Zhichao Liu, Xiyang Wu, Anhao Li, Yue Yu, Ergan Shang, Fuxiao Liu, Tong Zheng, Ninghao Liu, Lichao Sun, Haitao Mi, Leowei Liang
articleHumanize: Judgement Engineering for Agentic CodingSihao Liu, Ligeng Zhu, Zijian Zhang, Dongyun Zou, Zhengyang Zhang, Changye Li, Song Bian, Song Han, Tony Nowatzki
Checking sign-in…
Loading comments…