Vibeleaderboard
← All Intel
Intel / article

Loose Lips: Understanding Privacy Leakage in Agentic Dialogue

Source
arxiv.org
Author
Soumya Sharma, Ayana Hussain, Heber Hwang Arcolezi, Ulrich A\"ivodji, Spandana Gella, Adriana Romero-Soriano, Golnoosh Farnadi
Date
Why it matters

Stronger and reasoning-enabled models leaked more sensitive in agent-to-agent chats, and leakage grew with conversation length. Prompting alone did not decouple capability from leakage.

Key takeaways · AI-distilled
  • The benchmark, CIMemories Dialogue, has 4,410 two-agent dialogue instances in Contextual Integrity theory, judging whether information flows respect the norms under which the data was shared.
  • Leakage rose up to 3x between 1-turn and 6-turn conversations. The authors attribute higher leakage in thinking modes to the larger reasoning surface creates.
  • Results cover seven Qwen3 and Llama 3.1 models under three prompting conditions; none decoupled capability from leakage, which the authors frame as structural rather than a misconfiguration.
Terms in this piece · Glossary
  • open weights — A model whose trained parameters are published for anyone to download and run — unlike API-only models you can access but never possess.
  • context window — The maximum amount of text a model can consider at once — its working memory for the current conversation or task.
  • grounding — Tying a model's answers to checkable sources — retrieved documents, live data, tool results — instead of letting it answer from memory alone.
  • chain-of-thought — Having a model write out intermediate reasoning steps before its answer, which markedly improves performance on hard problems.
Recommended reads
Comments

Checking sign-in…

Loading comments…