Vibeleaderboard
← All Intel
Intel / article

Context Poisoning as Extreme-Value Attention Interference in Long-Context Language Models

Source
Meysam Ghaffari, Nina Fatehi, Bhaskar Sen, Nasim Sabetpour, Carlos Morato
Author
Meysam Ghaffari, Nina Fatehi, Bhaskar Sen, Nasim Sabetpour, Carlos Morato
Date
Key takeaways · AI-distilled
  • The paper models poisoning as extreme-value interference: the decisive evidence's score is bounded, while the maximum score among distractors keeps growing as more are added.
  • The N that matters is the effective count of confusable distractors, not raw context length, and the analysis links degradation to score aliasing, positional aliasing and softmax dilution.
  • In controlled tests, distractors in the same format as the evidence caused the largest accuracy drop among the tested distractor types at fixed context length.
  • Retrieval gating improved evidence use, but its net benefit depended on preserving evidence recall; the authors point to evidence bottlenecks, retrieve-then-reason designs and verifier-mediated memory as mitigations.
Terms in this piece · Glossary
  • context windowThe maximum amount of text a model can consider at once — its working memory for the current conversation or task.
  • AI agentAn AI system that doesn't just answer once but works toward a goal in a loop — taking actions, reading the results, and deciding what to do next.
  • attentionThe mechanism that lets a model weigh which earlier words matter for the word it's currently processing — the core operation of a transformer.
Why it matters

Gives a theoretical and empirical account of why retrieval accuracy drops as context fills with hard negatives, a concrete failure mode to budget for when stuffing tool outputs or documents into an 's context.

Recommended reads
Comments

Checking sign-in…

Loading comments…