Vibeleaderboard

Learn from the corpus

Latest IntelNews, research, field notes, and releases reviewed by the editorial system.Agentic Engineering RoadmapLearn the field in order through lessons built from current Intel.

Glossary Knowledge graph

BrowseAll Tools Browse by capability Head-to-head Market map Model Atlas

Find the right skill, CLI, harness, or service for the job.

Popular capabilities

Code with an agentWork across a repository from an issue, prompt, or terminal session.→Interface with your agentsCLI harnesses, IDEs, control planes, desktop apps, multiplexers, and terminals for steering coding agents.→Connect tools with MCPExpose data and actions to agents through Model Context Protocol servers.→Review any codebaseGive an agent a repeatable, high-signal engineering review process.→Find AI benchmarksSWE-bench, Terminal-Bench, Harvey LAB, and more→Dictate instead of typeSuperwhisper and Wispr Flow→

Explore

AI labsLiving dossiers on the organizations behind the models.

Index — Latest Intelligence

Intel

© 2026 Vibeleaderboard

About Contact Developers Privacy Terms Submit Map Roadmap Use with your agent

Intel / article

A Mixed-Method Empirical Study of LLM Assistance in Software Engineering Workflows

Source: Pamali D. Weerasinghe, Roshan N. Rajapakse, Isuru Dharmadasa, Chamath Keppitiyagama
Author: Pamali D. Weerasinghe, Roshan N. Rajapakse, Isuru Dharmadasa, Chamath Keppitiyagama
Date: Published Sep 7, 2026

Read the source ↗arxiv.org

Recommended reads

articleBeyond the Traceback: Using LLMs for Adaptive Explanations of Programming ErrorsAlexandru-Radu Moraru, Shreyan Biswas, Ujwal Gadiraju
articleDo Influence Tactics Matter? Investigating Prompt Framing Effects in LLM Code GenerationAlex Deaconu, Anubhav Gupta, Manaal Basha, Nicholas Haydu, Gema Rodr\'iguez-P\'erez
articleDo large language models scrutinise what they review? A multimodal audit of scoring calibration, error detection, and author-identity effectsEmad Alharbi

Comments

Checking sign-in…

Loading comments…