Vibeleaderboard
← All Intel
Intel / article

Diagnostic Foundation for Evaluating LLMs' Research Integrity as Co-Scientists

Source
Yash Tripathi, Silu Sharma, Sai Sidhanth Manoharan Jayanthi, Shivank Garg, Lin Li
Author
Yash Tripathi, Silu Sharma, Sai Sidhanth Manoharan Jayanthi, Shivank Garg, Lin Li
Date
Why it matters

Anyone deploying models as autonomous research or review agents now has a measured failure rate under pressure, and evidence that scaling up the model does not fix it.

Key quotes

“under peak pressure, models fail roughly 1 in 3 integrity-critical decisions, and neither scale nor reasoning ability reliably mitigates this”

Yash Tripathi, Silu Sharma, Sai Sidhanth Manoharan Jayanthi, Shivank Garg, Lin Li

“Explicit pressures induce compliance with misconduct, while implicit contextual reframing more often causes over-refusal of legitimate research tasks.”

Yash Tripathi, Silu Sharma, Sai Sidhanth Manoharan Jayanthi, Shivank Garg, Lin Li

“models failing to classify research requests accurately perform equally or better on artifact-grounded decision making (85.7 vs. 79.4), suggesting the three facets are structurally dissociated and correct ethical action does not require accurate classification”

Yash Tripathi, Silu Sharma, Sai Sidhanth Manoharan Jayanthi, Shivank Garg, Lin Li

“Frontier models can thus appear helpful while harbouring integrity failures that create two distinct deployment risks: facilitating research misconduct and eroding trust in AI-assisted research.”

Yash Tripathi, Silu Sharma, Sai Sidhanth Manoharan Jayanthi, Shivank Garg, Lin Li
Recommended reads
Comments

Checking sign-in…

Loading comments…