Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

AA Video Arena

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

Reviewed recommendation and limits

Use documented blind comparisons when choosing video generation systems.

Video preference ratings under matching generation conditions. Imported groups below may use different protocols; this review does not certify each run. Does not measure video understanding. Compare the same input format and generation conditions.

← All evaluation groups

AA Video Arena Elo

Source
Artificial Analysis
Version
Not reported
Measurement date
Not reported
Metric
Unit not reported · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
Current blind human-preference arena rating; observed 2026-10-19; result date not supplied

Exact score ties share a position. Positions do not establish statistical significance. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. #1Wan 3.0

    alibaba/wan-3.0-20260824

    1174

  2. #2Grok Imagine Video 1.5

    x-ai/grok-imagine-video-1.5-20260719

    1060

  3. #3HappyHorse 1.1

    alibaba/happyhorse-1.1-20260624

    1055

  4. #4HappyHorse 1.0

    alibaba/happyhorse-1.0-20260624

    1035

  5. #5Grok Imagine Video 1.5 Lite

    x-ai/grok-imagine-video-1.5-lite-20261001

    999

  6. #6Veo 3.1

    google/veo-3.1-20260320

    968

  7. #7Veo 3.1 Fast

    google/veo-3.1-fast-20260320

    965

  8. #8Veo 3.1 Lite

    google/veo-3.1-lite-20260331

    950

AA Video Arena model results | VibeLeaderboard