Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

ARC-AGI

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

Reviewed recommendation and limits

A useful test of unfamiliar-rule learning, with published testing policy and configurations.

ARC-AGI-1, 2 and 3 are distinct protocols. Imported groups below may use different protocols; this review does not certify each run. A strong ARC result does not establish workplace competence. Keep standard and provider-adapter runs apart.

← All evaluation groups

ARC-AGI

Source
ARC-AGI (reviewed publisher results)
Version
v2_Semi_Private
Measurement date
Not reported
Metric
% · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
ARC-AGI-2 semi-private; Claude Fable 5 (Low); CoT; Evaluation conducted with 'low' reasoning effort.; cost per task $1.4489280833333338; result details https://arcprize.org/results/anthropic-claude-fable-5; result date not supplied; source captured 2026-09-10

Fewer than two comparable models. No ranking is assigned. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. Claude Fable 5

    anthropic/claude-fable-5

    76.805556%

ARC-AGI model results | VibeLeaderboard