Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

ArXivMath

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

← All evaluation groups

ArXivMath August 2026

Source
MathArena (reviewed publisher results)
Version
2026-08-native-harness
Measurement date
Not reported
Metric
% · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
Final-answer correctness; 57 questions; LLM equivalence judge; August 2026 dataset; harness=Claude Code; configuration=Claude-Fable-5.1 (high); Python and SageMath tools; no internet; budget/time-limit instructions varied across models, see methodology https://matharena.ai/arxiv_august/; 95% CI 6.03%; cost per problem $12.77; result date not supplied; captured 2026-09-17; publisher flags model release after competition release

Fewer than two comparable models. No ranking is assigned. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. Claude Fable 5.1

    anthropic/claude-fable-5-1

    87.72%

ArXivMath model results | VibeLeaderboard