Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

BrokenArXiv

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

← All evaluation groups

BrokenArXiv August 2026

Source
MathArena (reviewed publisher results)
Version
2026-08-native-harness
Measurement date
Not reported
Metric
% · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
Mean rubric points normalized to percent; 56 questions; 0–3 grading, full credit requires identifying the statement as false; not binary accuracy; August 2026 dataset; harness=Claude Code 2.1.280; configuration=Claude-Opus-5.5 (high); reasoning effort high; Python and SageMath tools; no internet; budget/time-limit instructions varied across models, see methodology https://matharena.ai/arxiv_august/; 95% CI 10.96%; cost per problem $2.41; model configuration https://matharena.ai/models/anthropic_opus_55_high; result date not supplied; captured 2026-10-15; publisher flags model release after competition release; publisher model endpoint anthropic/claude-opus-5.5; publisher does not expose a dated provider revision

Fewer than two comparable models. No ranking is assigned. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. Claude Opus 5.5

    anthropic/claude-opus-5-5

    77.38%

BrokenArXiv model results | VibeLeaderboard