Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

Chartography

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

← All evaluation groups

Chartography w/ tools

Source
Anthropic (reviewed publisher results)
Version
unversioned
Measurement date
2026-09-22
Metric
% · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
Vendor-reported in Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5 launch table; adaptive thinking at max effort unless noted; evaluated with production safeguards on, and where they intervened, cybersecurity tasks fell back to Claude Opus 4.8 and biology/frontier-LLM tasks to Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic says this likely lowers scores); with tools; dated to the announcement

Positions are withheld because at least one result lacks explicit independent provenance or a documented evaluation scope. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. Claude Opus 5.5

    anthropic/claude-opus-5-5

    89%

    View modelEvidence model-card-reported
Chartography model results | VibeLeaderboard