Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

COCO

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

Reviewed recommendation and limits

COCO defines task-specific evaluation for boxes, instance masks and human keypoints. Read each task separately; AP is an aggregate precision metric, not classification accuracy.

Box and mask AP use intersection-over-union thresholds. Keypoint AP uses object keypoint similarity. Keep task, dataset edition, split, training regime and evaluation settings separate.. Imported groups below may use different protocols; this review does not certify each run. A shared dataset name does not establish comparable runs. The imported EdgeCrafter claims lack verified evaluator revisions, executed configurations, evaluated counts and measurement dates. They remain attributed publisher results without positions.

← All evaluation groups

COCO2017 mask AP50:95

Source
EdgeCrafter (reviewed publisher results)
Version
2017-validation
Measurement date
Not reported
Metric
AP · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
Publisher-reported instance segmentation AP50:95 on COCO2017 validation, input size 640. Training regime Objects365 pretraining followed by COCO downstream training. ECSeg and ECPose use transferred Objects365-pretrained detection models. Exact linked checkpoint https://github.com/capsule2077/edgecrafter/releases/download/edgecrafterv1_o365/ecseg_x_o3652coco.pth. The README attributes this value to this checkpoint; evaluated binary digest, exact evaluator revision, executed configuration, evaluated image or instance count, repeated runs and measurement date are not supplied. AP uses its task-specific aggregate, not an accuracy numerator divided by an example count. Latency configuration does not establish quality evaluation precision. This is an attributed publisher claim, not independently reproduced or a cross-publisher comparable run.

Positions are withheld because at least one result lacks explicit independent provenance or a documented evaluation scope. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. ECSeg-X O365-to-COCO

    intellindust/ecseg-x-o3652coco

    49.8 AP

    View modelEvidence model-card-reported
COCO model results | VibeLeaderboard