Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

CursorBench

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

Official source
← All evaluation groups

CursorBench

Source
Cursor via Epoch AI
Version
4.0
Measurement date
Not reported
Metric
% · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
Reasoning level Extra High · effort xhigh · result date not supplied

Positions are withheld because at least one result lacks explicit independent provenance or a documented evaluation scope. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. Claude Opus 5.5

    anthropic/claude-opus-5-5

    56%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  2. Claude Sonnet 5.5

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5

    53.1%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  3. Claude Fable 5.1

    anthropic/claude-fable-5-1

    51.6%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  4. Grok 4.7

    x-ai/grok-4.7-20260916

    46.3%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  5. Claude Opus 5

    anthropic/claude-opus-5

    46.1%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  6. Claude Haiku 5.5

    anthropic/claude-haiku-5-5

    44.3%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  7. Grok 4.6

    x-ai/grok-4.6-20260810

    41.4%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  8. GPT-5.6 Sol

    openai/gpt-5.6-sol-20260709

    37.7%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  9. Muse Spark 1.3

    meta/muse-spark-1.3-20260902

    37.5%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  10. GPT-5.6 Terra

    openai/gpt-5.6-terra-20260709

    33.6%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  11. GPT-5.6 Luna

    openai/gpt-5.6-luna-20260709

    33%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  12. Claude Sonnet 5

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5

    32%

    View modelEvidence aggregated
CursorBench model results | VibeLeaderboard