Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

CursorBench

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

← All evaluation groups

CursorBench

Source
Cursor via Epoch AI
Version
4.0
Measurement date
Not reported
Metric
% · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
Reasoning level High · effort high · result date not supplied

Positions are withheld because at least one result lacks explicit independent provenance or a documented evaluation scope. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. Claude Opus 5.5

    anthropic/claude-opus-5-5

    56%

  2. Gemini 4 Argon

    google/gemini-4-argon-20261013

    52.9%

  3. Claude Fable 5.1

    anthropic/claude-fable-5-1

    49.2%

  4. Claude Sonnet 5.5

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5

    47.8%

  5. Claude Opus 5

    anthropic/claude-opus-5

    44.7%

  6. Grok 4.7

    x-ai/grok-4.7-20260916

    43.9%

  7. Claude Haiku 5.5

    anthropic/claude-haiku-5-5

    42.3%

  8. Grok 4.6

    x-ai/grok-4.6-20260810

    40.4%

  9. Gemini 3.8 Flash

    google/gemini-3.8-flash-20260902

    39.6%

  10. GLM 5.3

    z-ai/glm-5.3-20260816

    38%

  11. GPT-5.6 Sol

    openai/gpt-5.6-sol-20260709

    35.7%

  12. Muse Spark 1.3

    meta/muse-spark-1.3-20260902

    33.4%

  13. GLM 5.3 Flash

    z-ai/glm-5.3-flash-20260826

    31.1%

  14. Claude Sonnet 5

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5

    30.8%

  15. GPT-5.6 Terra

    openai/gpt-5.6-terra-20260709

    30.7%

  16. GPT-5.6 Luna

    openai/gpt-5.6-luna-20260709

    29.4%

CursorBench model results | VibeLeaderboard