Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

GSO

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

Official source
← All evaluation groups

GSO

Source
GSO via Epoch AI
Version
Not reported
Measurement date
Not reported
Metric
% · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
Scaffold OpenHands · effort unspecified · result date not supplied

Positions are withheld because at least one result lacks explicit independent provenance or a documented evaluation scope. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. Claude Fable 5.1

    anthropic/claude-fable-5-1

    88.2%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  2. GPT-6 Astra

    openai/gpt-6-astra-20260903

    79.4%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  3. Claude Fable 5

    anthropic/claude-fable-5

    78.4%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  4. GPT-5.6 Sol

    openai/gpt-5.6-sol-20260709

    76.5%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  5. Claude Opus 4.8

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

    47.1%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  6. Claude Sonnet 5

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-5

    37.3%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  7. Claude Opus 4.6

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6

    33.3%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  8. Claude Opus 4.5

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-5

    26.5%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  9. Claude Sonnet 4.5

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5

    14.7%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  10. GPT-5.1

    openai/gpt-5.1-20251113

    13.7%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  11. Claude Opus 4

    anthropic/claude-opus-4

    6.9%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  12. Claude Sonnet 4

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-4

    4.9%

    View modelEvidence aggregated
GSO model results | VibeLeaderboard