Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

KellyBench

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

KellyBench

Source
KellyBench (reviewed publisher results)
Version
2023-24-season
Measurement date
Not reported
Metric
% · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
Mean ROI across 5 seeds; simulated 2023–24 EPL season; £100,000 initial bankroll; higher ROI is better; result date not supplied; source captured 2026-09-10

Exact score ties share a position. Positions do not establish statistical significance. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. #1Claude Opus 4.7

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

    -3.7%

  2. #2GPT-5.4

    openai/gpt-5.4-20260305

    -7.9%

  3. #3GPT-5.5

    openai/gpt-5.5-20260423

    -9.6%

  4. #4Claude Opus 4.6

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-6

    -11.2%

  5. #5GLM 5.2

    z-ai/glm-5.2-20260616

    -29.6%

  6. #6GLM 5

    z-ai/glm-5-20260211

    -51.6%

  7. #7Kimi K2.6

    moonshotai/kimi-k2.6-20260420

    -60.4%

  8. #8Mistral Medium 3.5

    mistralai/mistral-medium-3.5-20260430

    -77.9%

  9. #9Kimi K2.5

    moonshotai/kimi-k2.5-0127

    -89.6%

  10. #10Mistral Large 3 2512

    mistralai/mistral-large-2512

    -98.8%

KellyBench model results | VibeLeaderboard