Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

OSWorld

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

Reviewed recommendation and limits

Start with OSWorld for long desktop workflows. Select the task release and compare binary completion separately from partial credit.

Publisher-declared end-to-end results for June 24, August 8 and v2.1 task releases; binary completion and partial credit; full or offline datasets; exact step and tool settings. Imported groups below may use different protocols; this review does not certify each run. Full and offline datasets, task releases, step budgets, effort and tool settings stay separate. Provider effort labels do not imply equal compute. Exact execution backends and measurement dates are unreported; Muse Spark task denominators remain unresolved.

← All evaluation groups

OSWorld

Source
OSWorld via Epoch AI
Version
verified
Measurement date
Not reported
Metric
% · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
result date not supplied

Positions are withheld because at least one result lacks explicit independent provenance or a documented evaluation scope. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. Claude Opus 4.5

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-5

    66.3%

OSWorld model results | VibeLeaderboard