Model results

Roboflow Model Leaderboard

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

Official source

← All evaluation groups

Roboflow Model Leaderboard · mAP at IoU 0.50:0.95, medium objects

Source: Roboflow Model Leaderboard (reviewed publisher results)
Version: COCO 2017 (publisher version unspecified)
Measurement date: 2025-07-21
Metric: fraction · Higher is better
Evaluation scope: COCO 2017 object detection; medium objects; publisher-reported mAP at evaluation IoU 0.50:0.95; source fractions on 0–1 scale; inference parameters {"conf":0.001,"imgsz":640,"iou":0.7,"max_det":100,"verbose":false}; linked evaluator loads val2017/instances_val2017, but live table does not identify its split or dataset digest; declared model variants, not verified execution checkpoint hashes; executed dependency versions, hardware, precision, run count and uncertainty not supplied; publisher run-record date, not release date; size boundaries and exact aggregation implementation unverified

Exact score ties share a position. Positions do not establish statistical significance. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

#1YOLOv10x
thu-mig/yolov10x
0.5910378017671573 fraction
View modelEvidence independent
#2YOLOv10l
thu-mig/yolov10l
0.576451415837301 fraction
View modelEvidence independent
#3YOLOv10b
thu-mig/yolov10b
0.5720422528124978 fraction
View modelEvidence independent
#4YOLOv10m
thu-mig/yolov10m
0.5582107248112604 fraction
View modelEvidence independent
#5YOLOv10s
thu-mig/yolov10s
0.5042933532481031 fraction
View modelEvidence independent
#6YOLOv10n
thu-mig/yolov10n
0.41822263824398664 fraction
View modelEvidence independent