Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

Roboflow Model Leaderboard

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

← All evaluation groups

Roboflow Model Leaderboard · F1 at IoU 0.75, large objects

Source
Roboflow Model Leaderboard (reviewed publisher results)
Version
COCO 2017 (publisher version unspecified)
Measurement date
2025-06-27
Metric
fraction · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
COCO 2017 object detection; large objects; publisher-reported F1 at evaluation IoU 0.75; source fractions on 0–1 scale; inference parameters {"conf":0,"imgsz":640,"iou":0.7,"max_det":100,"verbose":false}; linked evaluator loads val2017/instances_val2017, but live table does not identify its split or dataset digest; declared model variants, not verified execution checkpoint hashes; executed dependency versions, hardware, precision, run count and uncertainty not supplied; publisher run-record date, not release date; size boundaries and exact aggregation implementation unverified; IoU threshold is not inference confidence; no peak-F1 or confidence-optimization claim

Exact score ties share a position. Positions do not establish statistical significance. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. #1YOLOv12x

    yolov12/yolov12x

    0.47011483611550425 fraction

  2. #2YOLOv12l

    yolov12/yolov12l

    0.4410922501156029 fraction

  3. #3YOLOv12m

    yolov12/yolov12m

    0.4175849263495326 fraction

  4. #4YOLOv12s

    yolov12/yolov12s

    0.3760544171123973 fraction

  5. #5YOLOv12n

    yolov12/yolov12n

    0.28542651958087845 fraction

Roboflow Model Leaderboard model results | VibeLeaderboard