Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

SWE-bench

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

Reviewed recommendation and limits

Use Verified as a historical shared-agent reference. Start with the locked public SWE-bench Pro V2 protocol for contemporary repository issue repair.

Historical Verified with mini-SWE-agent; preserve each imported suite and harness. Imported groups below may use different protocols; this review does not certify each run. OpenAI stopped reporting Verified after finding task defects and memorized solutions. Its 59.4% defect finding concerns 138 selected difficult tasks, not the full 500-task set. Imported Epoch runs have their own protocol.

← All evaluation groups

SWE-bench Verified

Source
Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
Version
Not reported
Measurement date
Not reported
Metric
% · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
Epoch AI run · task v2 · effort max · result date not supplied

Exact score ties share a position. Positions do not establish statistical significance. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. #1Claude Opus 4.7

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

    83.5%

  2. #2GLM 5.2

    z-ai/glm-5.2-20260616

    78.7%

  3. #3DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

    deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-20260423

    77.6%

SWE-bench model results | VibeLeaderboard