Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

Terminal-Bench

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

Reviewed recommendation and limits

Start with Terminal-Bench 4.0 for terminal-based agent work. Compare the same task release, agent and resource settings.

Terminal-Bench 4.0.0 on Harbor. Preserve agent, model, reasoning effort, task resources, trial count and resolution-rate uncertainty. Earlier 2.0, 2.1 and 3.0 results remain separate.. Imported groups below may use different protocols; this review does not certify each run. Public solutions, reward hacking and task-specific tuning can inflate results. Earlier editions and vendor-reported runs do not establish the current reviewed protocol. Terminal completion is different from repository issue repair.

← All evaluation groups

Terminal-Bench 2.0

Source
Terminal-Bench via Epoch AI
Version
2.0
Measurement date
Not reported
Metric
% · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
Agent Mini-SWE-Agent · effort unspecified · result date not supplied

Positions are withheld because at least one result lacks explicit independent provenance or a documented evaluation scope. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. Claude Sonnet 4.5

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5

    42.5%

  2. Claude Opus 4.1

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-1

    35.1%

  3. GPT-5

    openai/gpt-5-2025-08-07

    33.9%

  4. Claude Haiku 4.5

    anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

    29.8%

  5. GPT-5 Mini

    openai/gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

    22.2%

  6. gpt-oss-120b

    openai/gpt-oss-120b

    14.2%

  7. GPT-5 Nano

    openai/gpt-5-nano-2025-08-07

    7%

  8. gpt-oss-20b

    openai/gpt-oss-20b

    3.4%

Terminal-Bench model results | VibeLeaderboard