Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

WeirdML

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

Official source
← All evaluation groups

WeirdML

Source
WeirdML via Epoch AI
Version
v2
Measurement date
Not reported
Metric
% · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
no reasoning · result date not supplied

Positions are withheld because at least one result lacks explicit independent provenance or a documented evaluation scope. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. Claude Opus 4.8

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-8

    70.5%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  2. GPT-5.5

    openai/gpt-5.5-20260423

    67.2%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  3. GPT-5.4

    openai/gpt-5.4-20260305

    57.4%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  4. GPT-5.4 Pro

    openai/gpt-5.4-pro-20260305

    57.4%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  5. GPT-5.2

    openai/gpt-5.2-20251211

    49.6%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  6. GPT-5.4 Nano

    openai/gpt-5.4-nano-20260317

    38%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  7. GPT-5.4 Mini

    openai/gpt-5.4-mini-20260317

    37.9%

    View modelEvidence aggregated
WeirdML model results | VibeLeaderboard