Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

WeirdML

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

← All evaluation groups

WeirdML

Source
WeirdML via Epoch AI
Version
v2
Measurement date
Not reported
Metric
% · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
effort max · result date not supplied

Positions are withheld because at least one result lacks explicit independent provenance or a documented evaluation scope. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. GPT-6 Astra

    openai/gpt-6-astra-20260903

    93.3%

  2. Claude Fable 5.1

    anthropic/claude-fable-5-1

    92.9%

  3. Claude Fable 5

    anthropic/claude-fable-5

    91.9%

  4. Claude Opus 5

    anthropic/claude-opus-5

    91.8%

  5. GPT-5.6 Sol

    openai/gpt-5.6-sol-20260709

    87%

  6. Kimi K3

    moonshotai/kimi-k3-20260715

    82.6%

  7. Claude Opus 4.7

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

    75.5%

  8. GLM 5.3

    z-ai/glm-5.3-20260816

    75.4%

  9. GLM 5.2

    z-ai/glm-5.2-20260616

    70.1%

  10. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

    deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-20260813

    66.2%

  11. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

    deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-20260731

    63%

  12. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423

    deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-20260423

    48.9%

  13. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423

    deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-20260423

    45.6%

WeirdML model results | VibeLeaderboard