Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

WeirdML

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

Official source
← All evaluation groups

WeirdML

Source
WeirdML via Epoch AI
Version
v2
Measurement date
Not reported
Metric
% · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
effort 16K · result date not supplied

Positions are withheld because at least one result lacks explicit independent provenance or a documented evaluation scope. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. Claude Opus 4.5

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-5

    63.7%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  2. Gemini 2.5 Pro

    google/gemini-2.5-pro

    54%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  3. Claude Sonnet 4.5

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5

    47.7%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  4. Claude Sonnet 4

    anthropic/claude-sonnet-4

    46.1%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  5. Claude Opus 4.1

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-1

    45.9%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  6. Claude Haiku 4.5

    anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

    44.1%

    View modelEvidence aggregated

  7. Claude Opus 4

    anthropic/claude-opus-4

    43.7%

    View modelEvidence aggregated
WeirdML model results | VibeLeaderboard