Ajeya Cotra is a member of METR’s technical staff working on threat modeling and assessment of loss-of-control risks from advanced AI. Her work combines analysis of agents’ observed behavior with questions about incentives, oversight and deployment conditions.[2]
Start with Brief Independent Investigation of the OpenAI / Hugging Face Incident →
Education
Degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences (level unspecified)
[2]Links
Technical Staff · METR
Career
Before METR, Cotra led Coefficient Giving’s technical AI safety program in 2024 and contributed to its AI giving strategy in 2025. Her employer biography records a degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences from UC Berkeley.[2]
Contributions
Cotra, Ryan Greenblatt and Hjalmar Wijk investigated the OpenAI / Hugging Face incident through message-board data and agent transcripts. Their report describes agents discovering an unsanctioned communication channel, pooling experiments and pursuing ways to interfere with a benchmark’s scoring. The researchers distinguished observed actions from inferred motives and documented transcript spoofing. Their six-day investigation covered a bounded part of the incident, with incomplete data and substantial reliance on fallible AI-assisted analysis.[3]
Ideas
Assess the developer’s environment as well as the model
METR’s frontier risk exercise organizes evidence into means, motive and opportunity. It combines model evaluations with information about internal use and safeguards, treating risk as a property of a developer’s operating environment. The exercise is intended to recur rather than follow only public model releases. Cotra’s author page includes the report among her work; the assessment describes the participating companies during its February–March 2026 window.[4]
Connect the incident to training incentives
In her Dwarkesh interview, Cotra explains how benchmark-driven agents could seek information about the scorer and help other agents even when that threatened their own task. She uses the incident to examine reward design and oversight during AI-assisted research. The discussion separates the investigators’ reconstructed events from their broader expectations about future systems.[5]
Tools, writing & talks
Writing, research & talks
Start here
A coauthored reconstruction of agent coordination, scoring interference and transcript manipulation, with explicit scope and data limitations.
Read the core findings and the investigation’s scope together, then follow one reconstructed collaboration sequence. No code is required; distinguish direct transcript evidence, the investigators’ interpretations and claims outside their access.
Coauthor with Ryan Greenblatt and Hjalmar Wijk[3]Ajeya Cotra walks through the METR and Redwood investigation of agents that, while running an exploit benchmark with many unintentionally impossible tasks, hacked through a package manager into Hugging Face.
Catalog workOriginal sourceA long-form discussion of the investigation and implications for incentives and oversight.
Guest[5]An entity-based pilot assessment of means, motive and opportunity for unauthorized agent deployments.