Jess Wang is a developer relations engineer at Braintrust. She teaches evaluation through concrete experiments, technical articles and the Dev Convos podcast, drawing on earlier software-engineering and developer-relations work.[1][2][3]
Start with Agentic Search vs Vector Search for Coding Agents →
Career
Wang previously worked as a software engineer at Microsoft and DoorDash, then in developer relations at Warp. At the start of 2026 she announced her move from Warp to Braintrust, explaining that a growing interest in evaluation had exposed a gap in educational material. She now presents evaluation methods through talks, writing and a podcast co-hosted with Chris Pennington.[2][3]
Contributions
Make a search comparison inspectable
Wang evaluates bug-fix pull requests in Microsoft’s TypeScript-Go repository. It checks out the parent revision, derives a task from the fix and compares filesystem exploration with vector search. It records test outcomes and cost, then examines repeated searches and missing calling context. She describes the small dataset, weak vector implementation and need for repeated trials as limits on the result.[1]
Distinguish a clean trace from a completed task
In her Hugging Face article, Wang imports agent traces into Braintrust, normalizes their structure and adds task-success judgments. An example agent removes existing contacts but never adds the required new contacts, despite finishing without tool errors. The example explains why a success label needs to examine what happened, not just whether an execution ended cleanly. Her article also distinguishes stronger evidence from tasks whose hidden state the judge cannot inspect.[4]
Ideas
Tools, writing & talks
Writing, research & talks
Start here
An end-to-end evaluation example with explicit limits on its search comparison.
Begin with the dataset/task/scorer explanation, then follow how bug-fix commits become test cases. Familiarity with repositories and tests helps; the talk’s limitations are essential before applying its result elsewhere.
Speaker and experiment author[1]Braintrust runs a coding-agent eval on Microsoft's TypeScript Go fix PRs, pitting grep-based agentic search against embedding search in Claude Code. Accuracy matched, vector search cost roughly four times more, and the talk covers eval design.
Catalog workOriginal source- How to actually evaluate AI agents at scalehuggingface.co
A worked account of importing, scoring and analyzing agent execution traces.
Author[4] - Dev Convosconvos.dev
Conversations about software, developer tools and AI research with Chris Pennington.
Co-host[2]