Vibeleaderboard
← All Intel
Intel / post

"Do a full end-to-end QA test of OpenClaw with live API keys.

Source
x.com
Date

"Do a full end-to-end QA test of OpenClaw with live API keys. Use 12 subagents to split up functionality, spin up dev gateways with different ports, and use some to stress test. Orchestrate, use worktrees and create PRs autonomously. Set a goal to find 200 bugs. Fix the root cause each time, no band-aids. Refactors are okay, unless they touch the plugin SDK boundary. Write a test report in my desktop folder as markdown and keep updating that."

Context

Peter Steinberger's proposed QA workflow combines parallel testing with explicit boundaries. It asks twelve agents to divide functionality and stress testing, use separate working copies and server ports, and prepare fixes for review while maintaining a shared report.

The prompt also asks for root-cause fixes and permits refactoring except across the plugin SDK boundary, the interface plugins depend on. This describes how a broad testing effort could remain coordinated while preserving a sensitive interface. The figure of 200 bugs is a search target in the prompt; the post reports no achieved bug count.

More from Peter Steinberger 🦞
Recommended reads
Comments

Checking sign-in…

Loading comments…