Vibeleaderboard
← All Intel
Intel / article

Open models recap: more on Kimi K3, Qwen 3.8, Xi's WAIC speech, distillation, the open-closed gap, and what's next

Source
interconnects.ai
Author
Nathan Lambert
Date
Photo by Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash

Context

The gap between open and closed AI models depends on the work being assigned. In Nathan Lambert's open-model discussion, the speakers describe models that produce useful code or handle routine cleanup, yet miss edge cases that stronger models catch. They also describe response speed as a reason to use a model whose capability is sufficient for the task.

These are workflow observations, rather than a controlled ranking. Their useful implication is that a single estimate of how many months open models lag obscures separate questions: whether a model handles the relevant task, and whether its serving speed makes it practical to use.

Key takeaways · AI-distilled
  • The 'how many months behind is open source' question has no answer because each side picks its favorite . The ones that track what people actually buy are agentic coding and computer use; the rest measures long-tail robustness.
  • Kimi K3 is large enough that it takes a full node of B300s just to load the weights, so the community post-training wave that followed Qwen and GLM will need serious engineering before it shows up here.
  • A big scale-up usually ships with rough-edged post-training, which is exactly why fine-tuning a fresh giant open model pays off: there is performance left in it that the lab did not have time to extract.
  • Speed beats marginal quality in daily use. GLM 5.2 on a fast endpoint at 200-300 per second wins grunt work because picking a model and a reasoning effort in Codex costs more time than the quality gap buys back.
  • One concrete finding from their own data: Reddit discussion of a new open model leads its Hugging Face download takeoff by one to two months, making forum chatter an early indicator of which models get adopted.
Terms in this piece · Glossary
  • distillation — Training a small, cheap model to imitate a big one's outputs, keeping much of the capability at a fraction of the cost.
  • benchmark — A standard public test set for comparing AI models — the shared scoreboards behind every "model X beats model Y" claim.
  • fine-tuning — Taking a trained model and training it a bit more on your own examples so it gets better at one specific job.
  • token — The chunk of text a model reads and writes in — roughly three-quarters of a word — and the unit AI usage is billed in.
Key quotes

“So I would say that Kimi K3 is like 54-55 level for these kind of tasks.”

Florian Brand

“And I think this is actually one of the best arguments for not doing anything.”

Nathan Lambert

“So they had to use GLM, a lesser capable model, but it had no guardrails for this kind of defensive action.”

Florian Brand

“And so I just think the argument that distillation is helping more because RL is becoming more prevalent is not grounded in literature that we have today.”

Nathan Lambert
Read the source www.interconnects.ai
More from Nathan Lambert
Recommended reads
Comments

Checking sign-in…

Loading comments…