Vibeleaderboard
← All Intel
Intel / post

Cognition's FrontierCode 2.0 tests judgment beyond the spec

Source
x.com
Date
Cognition@cognition

Introducing FrontierCode 2.0: our new coding benchmark that measures a model’s ability to go beyond the spec. Most coding evals measure a model’s ability to write code that meets a spec. With FrontierCode 1.0, we asked a new question: would you actually merge the PR? FrontierCode 2.0 is comprised of more diverse tasks, featuring larger scopes and higher mergeability standards. We are now asking: not only would you merge this PR, but should you? One key feature of FrontierCode 2.0 is underspecified prompts. Rather than including every engineering decision, prompts are deliberately ambiguous, giving the models room to demonstrate their judgment. The result is a benchmark that is far from saturated, with the top model scoring just 45%.

Why it matters

Rankings differ from DeepSWE: models that top that land mid-pack when prompts are underspecified and mergeability is judged. Cost per task is reported, so engineers can weigh score against spend.

Terms in this piece · Glossary
  • benchmark — A standard public test set for comparing AI models — the shared scoreboards behind every "model X beats model Y" claim.
More from Cognition
Recommended reads
Comments

Checking sign-in…

Loading comments…