The authors trace uneven RL results to two weak points. First, hard queries with high semantic entropy often yield sample groups that are all wrong, collapsing the group-relative advantage to zero exactly where hallucinationWhen a model states something false with full confidence — inventing facts, citations, or APIs that don't exist.Full definition → risk is highest.
Second, confident-but-wrong tokens barely get corrected: a categorical policy's expected score-gradient norm vanishes as its distribution sharpens, so the predictions most in need of correction receive the weakest updates.
DEEPO adds expert prefixes with groundingTying a model's answers to checkable sources — retrieved documents, live data, tool results — instead of letting it answer from memory alone.Full definition → continuations on high-uncertainty queries to restore advantage variance, and applies advantage-sign-aware Renyi preconditioning so correction reaches confident errors.
Each branch improves on GRPO alone. Their interaction is statistically significant on VideoMMMU (+4.0, 95% CI 1.1 to 6.9) and additive on the other tasks.
Terms in this piece · Glossary
hallucination — When a model states something false with full confidence — inventing facts, citations, or APIs that don't exist.
multimodal — A model that works with more than text — reading images, audio, or video, and sometimes generating them too.
fine-tuning — Taking a trained model and training it a bit more on your own examples so it gets better at one specific job.
grounding — Tying a model's answers to checkable sources — retrieved documents, live data, tool results — instead of letting it answer from memory alone.
Why it matters
Explains a specific mechanical reason RL fine-tuningTaking a trained model and training it a bit more on your own examples so it gets better at one specific job.Full definition → often fails to reduce hallucination on the hardest, highest-risk queries, and offers a targeted fix instead of just more RL compute.