← All IntelClip / OtherSpeed/performance comparison to Qwen3.8 Max
From Meta Muse Code Is HERE – Spark 1.2 & Meta’s NEW Coding Agent! · ≈8:15
“It's not great.”
“I think the Quan 3.8 max one was better.”
“it had this disgusting sine wave sound that made me mad, so uh it was better than Musepark 1.1”
What’s in it
- Compares two AI-generated driving demos for speed and physics glitches
- Flags missing mesh colliders on cars and buildings breaking collisions
- Notes an annoying looping sine-wave sound bug in one model's output
Clip transcript
You're probably familiar with what I'm talking about. All right. We just jacked this way. It is quite slow. Interesting because another model recently had the speed cap. It was Quan 3.8 max. It was capped to 40 km or so as well, and it was infuriating. Okay, no mesh colliders on the car or they on the buildings? Yes. I wonder if we can run faster than the car was going. It's about a toss-up. Can we take this? All right. We do have a mini map. Let me try to get to something on the mini map. It's not great. >> [laughter] >> I think the Quan 3.8 max one was better. That's just the most recent one in my memory, but it had this disgusting sine wave sound that made me mad, so uh it was better than Musepark 1.1, I
Comments
Sign in to comment.
Loading comments…