A model can sound like it knows a drug—even when it doesn’t. Researchers at @UTAustin, @Northeastern, & @UTMDAnderson found LLMs often lack drug-specific knowledge and instead lean on morphology. Because Olmo is open, they could use it to trace why. 🧵 https://t.co/sjFbKqoEFx

@UTAustin @Northeastern @UTMDAnderson Many drug names contain clues to their class: “-pril” → ACE inhibitors “-olol” → beta blockers “-azoline” → certain decongestants Those clues can let a model answer from the structure of the name rather than from knowledge about the specific medication.

@UTAustin @Northeastern @UTMDAnderson The researchers built a diagnostic to separate 3 signals models like Olmo might rely on: → the affix, like “-pril” → the drug’s unique stem → actual drug-specific knowledge They replaced parts of drug names with invented strings & measured how Olmo 3’s answers changed.
@UTAustin @Northeastern @UTMDAnderson The results showed a big gap between sounding knowledgeable & knowing the drug. For 51–59% of tested drugs, Olmo 3’s response to the real name was barely distinguishable from its response to a made-up one. Another 12–18% appeared driven by the affix itself.
answers about specific drugs are often driven by name morphology, not knowledge of the drug, and the effect grows as the drug gets rarer in training data. Fluent output is not evidence of , and the substitution test used here is reusable.
Checking sign-in…
Loading comments…