Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

FrontierMath

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

Reviewed recommendation and limits

Use the relevant tier and private/public split for difficult mathematical reasoning.

Each tier, release and public/private split separately. Imported groups below may use different protocols; this review does not certify each run. Difficulty is specialized; tier, dataset release, tools and grader must match before comparing scores.

← All evaluation groups

FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 v2 · private

Source
Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
Version
tiers-1-3-v2-private
Measurement date
Not reported
Metric
% · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
Epoch AI run · task v2 · effort low · result date not supplied

Exact score ties share a position. Positions do not establish statistical significance. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. #1GLM 5.2

    z-ai/glm-5.2-20260616

    54.7%

  2. #2GPT-5.6 Luna

    openai/gpt-5.6-luna-20260709

    41.4%

  3. #3GPT-5

    openai/gpt-5-2025-08-07

    37.2%

  4. #4GPT-5.4 Mini

    openai/gpt-5.4-mini-20260317

    24.6%

  5. #5Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

    google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-20260507

    22.5%

  6. #6GPT-5.4 Nano

    openai/gpt-5.4-nano-20260317

    20.4%

  7. #7o3

    openai/o3-2025-04-16

    19.3%

  8. #8GPT-5 Mini

    openai/gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

    18.2%

  9. #9o4 Mini

    openai/o4-mini-2025-04-16

    16.1%

  10. #10o1

    openai/o1-2024-12-17

    8.4%

  11. #11GPT-5 Nano

    openai/gpt-5-nano-2025-08-07

    6%

  12. #12o3 Mini

    openai/o3-mini-2025-01-31

    3.9%

FrontierMath model results | VibeLeaderboard