Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

FrontierMath

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

Reviewed recommendation and limits

Use the relevant tier and private/public split for difficult mathematical reasoning.

Each tier, release and public/private split separately. Imported groups below may use different protocols; this review does not certify each run. Difficulty is specialized; tier, dataset release, tools and grader must match before comparing scores.

← All evaluation groups

FrontierMath 2025-02-28 · private

Source
Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
Version
2025-02-28-private
Measurement date
Not reported
Metric
% · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
Epoch AI run · task v1 · effort xhigh · superseded by FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 v2 · private · result date not supplied

Exact score ties share a position. Positions do not establish statistical significance. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. #1GPT-5.4 Pro

    openai/gpt-5.4-pro-20260305

    50%

  2. #2GPT-5.4

    openai/gpt-5.4-20260305

    47.6%

  3. #3Claude Opus 4.7

    anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

    43.8%

  4. #4GPT-5.2

    openai/gpt-5.2-20251211

    40.7%

FrontierMath model results | VibeLeaderboard