Vibeleaderboard
← Benchmark guide

Model results

FrontierMath

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

Reviewed recommendation and limits

Use the relevant tier and private/public split for difficult mathematical reasoning.

Each tier, release and public/private split separately. Imported groups below may use different protocols; this review does not certify each run. Difficulty is specialized; tier, dataset release, tools and grader must match before comparing scores.

← All evaluation groups

FrontierMath 2025-02-28 · private

Source
Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub
Version
2025-02-28-private
Measurement date
Not reported
Metric
% · Higher is better
Evaluation scope
Epoch AI run · task v1 · effort high · superseded by FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 v2 · private · result date not supplied

Exact score ties share a position. Positions do not establish statistical significance. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

  1. #1GPT-5.2

    openai/gpt-5.2-20251211

    40.3%

  2. #2Gemini 3.5 Flash

    google/gemini-3.5-flash-20260519

    39%

  3. #3GPT-5

    openai/gpt-5-2025-08-07

    32.4%

  4. #4GPT-5.1

    openai/gpt-5.1-20251113

    31%

  5. #5GPT-5.4 Mini

    openai/gpt-5.4-mini-20260317

    28.3%

  6. #6GPT-5 Mini

    openai/gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

    27.2%

  7. #7GPT-5.4 Nano

    openai/gpt-5.4-nano-20260317

    25.9%

  8. #8o4 Mini

    openai/o4-mini-2025-04-16

    24.8%

  9. #9o3

    openai/o3-2025-04-16

    18.7%

  10. #10o3 Mini

    openai/o3-mini-2025-01-31

    12.4%

  11. #11o1

    openai/o1-2024-12-17

    9.3%

  12. #12GPT-5 Nano

    openai/gpt-5-nano-2025-08-07

    8.3%

FrontierMath model results | VibeLeaderboard