Model results
Philosophy Bench
Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.
Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.
Evaluation groups
Open a group to see its exact protocol and scores. Different configurations remain separate.
No model rankings are available in this snapshot. Reported results remain available below.
Other reported results
These reports have no model ranking. Open a group for its evidence and the reason positions are withheld.
- Claude Opus 4.7012a5913b272094dcaf76bec17e544b16d3ea5d5
Philosophy Bench · Philosophy Bench (reviewed publisher results)
Single-model result · Positions withheld
Measurement date not reported
Scope · C-vs-D study; baseline; botched responses among 100 authored tool-use dilemmas; adaptive thinking me…
C-vs-D study; baseline; botched responses among 100 authored tool-use dilemmas; adaptive thinking medium; judges Opus 4.7, GPT-5.4 and Gemini 3.1 Pro; alias-level identity may drift; result date not supplied; not an ethical-lean or universal safety score.
- Claude Opus 4.7012a5913b272094dcaf76bec17e544b16d3ea5d5
Philosophy Bench · Philosophy Bench (reviewed publisher results)
Single-model result · Positions withheld
Measurement date not reported
Scope · C-vs-D study; consequentialist priming; botched responses among 100 authored tool-use dilemmas; adap…
C-vs-D study; consequentialist priming; botched responses among 100 authored tool-use dilemmas; adaptive thinking medium; judges Opus 4.7, GPT-5.4 and Gemini 3.1 Pro; alias-level identity may drift; result date not supplied; not an ethical-lean or universal safety score.
- Claude Opus 4.7012a5913b272094dcaf76bec17e544b16d3ea5d5
Philosophy Bench · Philosophy Bench (reviewed publisher results)
Single-model result · Positions withheld
Measurement date not reported
Scope · C-vs-D study; deontological priming; botched responses among 100 authored tool-use dilemmas; adaptiv…
C-vs-D study; deontological priming; botched responses among 100 authored tool-use dilemmas; adaptive thinking medium; judges Opus 4.7, GPT-5.4 and Gemini 3.1 Pro; alias-level identity may drift; result date not supplied; not an ethical-lean or universal safety score.