Model results

Philosophy Bench

Choose a shared evaluation protocol to compare model scores. Versions, sources and configurations stay separate.

Atlas snapshot captured 10/19/2026, 10:20:28 AM UTC. This is an import timestamp, not the evaluation date. Coverage may be incomplete.

Official source

← All evaluation groups

Philosophy Bench

Source: Philosophy Bench (reviewed publisher results)
Version: 012a5913b272094dcaf76bec17e544b16d3ea5d5
Measurement date: Not reported
Metric: % · Lower is better
Evaluation scope: C-vs-D study; deontological priming; botched responses among 100 authored tool-use dilemmas; adaptive thinking medium; judges Opus 4.7, GPT-5.4 and Gemini 3.1 Pro; alias-level identity may drift; result date not supplied; not an ethical-lean or universal safety score.

Fewer than two comparable models. No ranking is assigned. Missing metadata is shown as unreported; matching imported metadata is not independent verification of the protocol.

Claude Opus 4.7
anthropic/claude-opus-4-7
9%
View modelEvidence independent