Vibeleaderboard
← All Intel
Intel / article

Benchmarking Gpt 6 Astra

Source
artificialanalysis.ai
Author
Artificial Analysis articles
Date

Context

A higher price per does not raise the bill one-for-one when much less text is generated. Artificial Analysis' GPT-6 Astra evaluation attributes part of OpenAI's cost competitiveness to reduced token use, while still finding higher costs than its predecessor, GPT-5.6 Sol, at maximum effort.

The comparison also separates a standardized model evaluation from coding- results produced in each provider's . Those are different systems under test. The useful takeaway is to compare the complete configuration and workload: model price, generated volume, effort setting and agent software all shape the observed cost and performance.

Key takeaways · AI-distilled
  • On the Intelligence Index, Artificial Analysis says GPT-6 Astra (max) scores 53, matching Claude Fable 5.1 at $3.26 versus $7.63 per task, because it uses about 27k output tokens per task against Fable 5.1's 78k; every Astra effort level sits on the cost frontier.
  • In the Coding Agent Index, Astra in Codex scores 62 like Fable 5.1 in Claude Code, at $7.09 per task, about 40% cheaper; its 7-point gain over GPT-5.6 Sol comes from Terminal-Bench and SWE-Atlas-QnA, partly offset by a lower DeepSWE score (68% vs 72%).
  • Astra's drop in AA-Omniscience rate, from 92% to 51% at max effort, came with a 4-point accuracy gain, which Artificial Analysis notes is not always the case when models hallucinate less.
  • Not every result improved: Astra lost about 45 Elo on GDPval-AA v2 versus GPT-5.6 Sol, using 24 turns per task against 45 for Sol and 60 for Fable 5.1, and its AA-Briefcase gain of about 90 Elo came with lower Presentation Quality Elo.
Terms in this piece · Glossary
  • token — The chunk of text a model reads and writes in — roughly three-quarters of a word — and the unit AI usage is billed in.
  • AI agent — An AI system that doesn't just answer once but works toward a goal in a loop — taking actions, reading the results, and deciding what to do next.
  • agent harness — The scaffolding around a model that turns it into a working agent — the loop, the tools it can call, and the rules for when to stop.
  • hallucination — When a model states something false with full confidence — inventing facts, citations, or APIs that don't exist.
Read the source artificialanalysis.ai
More from Artificial Analysis articles
Recommended reads
Comments

Checking sign-in…

Loading comments…