Grok 4.7 is behind only Anthropic models on AA-Briefcase, ranking just behind Opus 5 at ~50% of its Cost per Task
Grok 4.7’s improvements over Grok 4.6 are clear in AA-Briefcase-Lite, our public due diligence scenario where models are tasked with building market models and target assessment decks. Grok 4.7 gains significantly in Analytical Quality Elo (1698 → 1994) with a slight regression in Presentation Elo (1531 → 1499).
API cost to produce example decks: Grok 4.7 (xhigh) ~$8 vs. Grok 4.6 (xhigh) ~$4.40
benchmark — A standard public test set for comparing AI models — the shared scoreboards behind every "model X beats model Y" claim.
AI agent — An AI system that doesn't just answer once but works toward a goal in a loop — taking actions, reading the results, and deciding what to do next.
Why it matters
Grok 4.7 now trails only Anthropic's models on this due-diligence benchmarkA standard public test set for comparing AI models — the shared scoreboards behind every "model X beats model Y" claim.Full definition → while costing about half as much per task as Opus 5, a real option for cost-sensitive analytical AI agentAn AI system that doesn't just answer once but works toward a goal in a loop — taking actions, reading the results, and deciding what to do next.Full definition → work.
