Hybrid (transformer–RNN) models are fast becoming a serious alternative to the transformer, but a big question remains: how do they process tokens differently & how does this impact performance? We compared our transformer (Olmo 3) & hybrid (Olmo Hybrid) models to find out. 🧵

A transformer’s attention layers can look back at any earlier token exactly. A hybrid model swaps most of those layers for recurrent ones that excel at sequential processing. Do these differences give hybrid models and transformers different strengths?
To find out, we scored how well Olmo 3 & Olmo Hybrid predicted different kinds of next tokens across articles, books, papers, code, HTML, & LaTeX. The models are matched on data, tokenizer, & training recipe, so a gap in their predictions points to architecture differences.
We found that the hybrid model advantage is highest on meaning-bearing words—the nouns, verbs, & adjectives that say what a sentence is about. On function words like "the," "of," & "is," its advantage over transformers remains, but is more muted.

Aggregate loss hides where hybrid RNN and models differ. Filtering loss by type shows transformers keep the edge on copying exactly from earlier , which is what long code and retrieval-style tasks lean on.
Checking sign-in…
Loading comments…