Vibeleaderboard
← All Intel
Intel / article

Aa Briefcase

Source
artificialanalysis.ai
Author
Artificial Analysis articles
Date
Why it matters

It tests agents on connected multi-week projects rather than isolated prompts, and separates correctness from presentation quality. Use it for realistic comparisons, including cost against open-weights options like GLM-5.2.

Key takeaways · AI-distilled
  • AA-Briefcase runs models through four multi-week projects with 91 private tasks and nearly 2,000 source files, including more than 3,500 emails and 25,000 Slack messages that are fragmented and sometimes contradictory.
  • Scoring combines binary rubric checks for correctness with pairwise grading of analytical and presentation quality, so outputs that look polished but are wrong or shallow are exposed rather than rewarded.
  • At launch Claude Fable 5 led the combined Elo, followed by Claude Opus 4.8 (max) and GLM-5.2 (max), with GPT-5.5 (xhigh) fourth; GLM-5.2 was the clear leader on capability versus cost.
  • Scenarios were built over months by experts in data science, product management and corporate strategy from firms including Google, McKinsey and BCG; a fifth public scenario on Hugging Face is demonstrative and does not count.
Terms in this piece · Glossary
  • benchmark — A standard public test set for comparing AI models — the shared scoreboards behind every "model X beats model Y" claim.
  • open weights — A model whose trained parameters are published for anyone to download and run — unlike API-only models you can access but never possess.
Read the source artificialanalysis.ai
More from Artificial Analysis articles
Recommended reads
Comments

Checking sign-in…

Loading comments…